Are these pictures film or video - see if you can guess

[Scotness]

Here's a go the DOP of In My image David Rusanow did - pretty good I think




Scot M

[MovieStuff]

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Scotness:
BTW wasn't Lawrence shot on 60mm - or 65mm -</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

Yes, you are correct. I had forgotten. Still, I feel my statement is true regarding big budget 35mm films.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">quote:</font><table border="0" width="90%" bgcolor="#333333" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="0"><tr><td width="100%"><table border="0" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="2" bgcolor="#FF9900"><tr><td width="100%" bgcolor="#DDDDDD"><font size=2 face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Originally posted by Scotness:
aren't the colours a bit muted because of the technicolour process - a friend of mine told me that - is that true?</font></td></tr></table></td></tr></table></BLOCKQUOTE>

LOA was shot on color negative stock and not in the three strip technicolor process. However, in general, the three strip process often yielded yahoo color which many felt was unnatural looking, though still very beautiful. Gone with the Wind is a pretty good example of the three strip process but I am pretty darned sure that the three strip process had been dropped in favor of color neg by the time LOA was shot. I mean, can you imagine carrying around those refrigerator sized cameras in the desert? [img]smile.gif[/img]